Skip to main content

Recent comments

User login

Navigation

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.

Syndicate contentRuth Bader Ginsburg

Supreme Court Hears Medi-Cal

October 3, 2011 by Calitics

Calitics's picture
Original Author: 
Brian Leubitz
High Court to consider massive cuts to services and reimbursement rates.

by Brian Leubitz

The United States Supreme Court opened up its 2011-2012 term, and oh yeah, they're talking California:

The Supreme Court began a new term Monday by refereeing a major healthcare dispute to decide whether cash-strapped states like California can cut their Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals who serve low-income patients.
*** **** ***
Lawyers for California and the Obama administration urged the court to rule that Medicaid is a "voluntary" effort to provide medical care for the poor and that disputes over funding should be resolved by healthcare officials in Sacramento and Washington, not by federal judges in San Francisco.
*** **** ***

Monday Open Thread

September 21, 2009 by Jack and Jill P...

Supreme Court Sotomayor
In this image released by the Supreme Court of the United States, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor pose for a photo in the Justices’ Conference Room prior to Justice Sotomayor’s formal Investiture Ceremony Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009, in Washington.
(AP Photo/Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States, Steve Petteway)

Good Morning.

As you begin a new week, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

Hooray for Sonia

September 17, 2009 by JUSIPER

Going, along with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, where the Court ought to.During arguments in a campaign-finance case, the court's majority conservatives seemed persuaded that corporations have broad First Amendment rights and that recent precedents upholding limits on corporate political spending should be overruled.But Justice Sotomayor suggested the majority might have it all wrong -- and that instead

Open thread - Obama/McCain forum, convention coverage choices (w/poll)

August 16, 2008 by PamsHouseBlend

PamsHouseBlend's picture
I'm taking a sanity break and watching the Olympics this evening, recording the event to analyze later. It's an open thread to discuss the Saddleback Church forum if you're watching it.

For liveblogging, surf over to Pandagon for Jesse's take, or over to Gina's for her thoughts -- she's using CoverItLive.

11:00: Some recaps from CNN: all you need to know to explain why McCain should not be elected:

McCain said he would have never nominated Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens.

"This nomination should be based on the criteria on a proven record of strictly adhering to the Constitution and not legislating from the bench," McCain added.

The Arizona senator said he was "proud" of President Bush for nominating conservative Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts to the court.

On the issue of marriage equality, Obama, as usual, tries to have it both ways. What he holds is an irreconcilable, illogical position.

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes