Skip to main content

Recent comments

User login

Navigation

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.

Syndicate contentNorth Carolina

Weather Politics

September 4, 2011 by Blue Oklahoma

Blue Oklahoma's picture
Original Author: 
DocHoc
 Image of Gov. Mary Fallin

It seems like for now Oklahoma Republicans are rejecting the disaster-cost ideology recently presented by a national GOP leader, but what about next year?

In a response to Hurricane Irene, which hit the East Coast about a week ago, U.S. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, made the argument that federal money used in disaster response and relief should be offset by cuts in other parts of the federal budget. Cantor told Fox News:

There's a federal role; yes we're going to find the money, we're just going to need to make sure that there are savings elsewhere to continue to do so.

We don't need no stinkin' czars

September 17, 2009 by hummingbirdminds

Wyoming's lone U.S. Representative, Cynthia Lummis of Cheyenne, joined other Republican deep thinkers such as Michelle Bachmann (R-Penn.), Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), and Pete Sessions (R-Texas) as co-sponsors for H.R. 3226: The Czar Accountability and Reform Act or "CZAR."

I suppose this is an acceptable acronym. The legislators had to stoop to borrowing the first and second letters of "Czar." In reality, it should be TCAARA, but that's just an abbreviation and not an annoying acronym to wave in the faces of Democrats.

This bill proposes:

To provide that appropriated funds may not be used to pay for any salaries or expenses of any task force, council, or similar office which is established by or at the direction of the President and headed by an individual who has been inappropriately appointed to such position (on other than an interim basis), without the advice and consent of the Senate.

Sponsor is another deep thinker from the South, Rep. Jack Kingston [R-GA1]

Sen. Enzi: Please explain why getting beat up by your spouse is a "pre-existing condition"

September 16, 2009 by hummingbirdminds

This Huffington Post article was also on AlterNet:

It turns out that in eight states, plus the District of Columbia, getting beaten up by your spouse is a pre-existing condition.

Under the cold logic of the insurance industry, it makes perfect sense: If you are in a marriage with someone who has beaten you in the past, you're more likely to get beaten again than the average person and are therefore more expensive to insure.

In human terms, it's a second punishment for a victim of domestic violence.

In 2006, Democrats tried to end the practice. An amendment introduced by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), now a member of leadership, split the Health Education Labor & Pensions Committee 10-10. The tie meant that the measure failed.

All ten no votes were Republicans, including Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming), a member of the "Gang of Six" on the Finance Committee who are hashing out a bipartisan bill. A spokesman for Enzi didn't immediately return a call from Huffington Post.

@roccodispirito Ouch They're very proud of their BBQ in NC. Of course, that applies to Texas, Kansas City, etc. (via Twitter)

April 4, 2009 by admin

“@ Ouch They're very proud of their BBQ in NC. Of course, that applies to Texas, Kansas City, etc.”
49 minutes ago - Comment - Like

March 20, 2009 by admin

“@ Please. Let. It. Happen. We have to go 2 for 2 in NC.”
1 hour ago - Comment - Like
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • next ›
  • last »
Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes