Original Author:
jer45y@gmail.com (James Rowen)
The Journal Sentinel says in a Sunday
editorial that questions about the relationship between Waukesha's access to and use of diverted Lake Michigan water and potential growth are not appropriate.
Let's look at this differently.
I would argue that these are perfectly reasonable and relevant questions, for three reasons, at least:
1. The Great Lakes Compact, under which the Waukesha diversion application us being made, is principally a water management and conservation document about a shared resource held in trust for the people of two provinces and eight states - - and is not principally a diversion exception document.
2. If the diversion is to help Waukesha grow - - and its application cites new areas to its west and south for annexation to which water will be provided - - who or what will guarantee that the growth actually helps the region, since the water is a multi-state/regional resource?
At the public meeting in late January where the city rolled out its application, at least two Waukesha city alderman bluntly said they would not support any agreements with Milwaukee as the potential supplier that went beyond a bare-bones water rate deal.
Recent comments
7 weeks 17 hours ago
14 weeks 6 days ago
16 weeks 14 hours ago
29 weeks 5 hours ago
1 year 5 days ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 10 weeks ago
1 year 12 weeks ago
1 year 15 weeks ago
1 year 16 weeks ago